Monday, 30 June 2014

Science teaching in primary school: It's implication for Nigeria

SCIENCE TEACHING IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: IT'S IMPLICATION FOR NIGERIA
BY
AINA, JACOB KOLA
B.Sc (ED) Physics, PGDE, M.Ed(sci. Edu)
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS
KWARA STATE COLLEGE OF EDUCATIION (T) LAFIAGI
KWARA STATE, NIGERIA
Abstract
The study took a descriptive survey of science teaching in primary school in Edu Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria. Questionnaire containing 30 items in two sections was used to sample teacher's views on science teaching in primary schools. Analysis of the returned questionnaire was done using frequency count and percentages. Results revealed that none science teachers were teaching science, no science laboratory and library with relevant science textbooks. One of the recommendations was that science in primary school must be taught by specialized science teachers.
                                     

Background to the problem
Science can be define in many ways by different author and researcher. However, it is common to all definitions that science is a body of knowledge characterized by unbiased observation and systematic experimentation.
            In all level of education and in any nation of the world science is the same but the teachings differ. To have good results in any human endeavour there must be a good foundation, that is why science teaching in primary school should be taken very serious. According to Momoh (2001) primary education is the foundation of formal education on which the subsequent levels of the nation's education system rest.
            We have many unqualified science teachers in primary school today; not professionally unqualified but they are not qualified to teach science. For a sound teaching of primary science, teachers in primary schools must be given urgent and adequate attention as opined by Momoh (2001).
            Science is different from all other disciplines and its teaching and curriculum must be different too. Akinola (2006) observed poor teacher's method of teaching and structuring of curriculum as problems of primary science teaching. Uchenna (2005) affirmed that the greatest challenge in education in Africa has been the question of curriculum development, especially science curriculum at all levels of education.
            Maduabum (1991) in a paper titled Primary School Science Teaching in Nigeria: A need for Re-Appraisal, said primary education is the bedrock of our educational continuum and it requires a solid foundation in science. The words of Yoloye (1994) that primary education in Nigeria is in a state of crisis are true because of what we are witnessing today.
            Science must be made real to the pupil in primary schools through good method of teaching, use of good instructional materials and improvisation where necessary. According to Daniel (2001), teachers need to be exposed to the production and learning materials using available resources especially at this age of information technology.
            Abimbola (1999) observed that, the primary; purpose of using instrumental materials in teaching and learning process is to make teaching more effective and facilitate learning. However, it will amount to wasteful exercise if a teacher decides to use materials that are not readily available or too cost to purchase; therefore the idea of improvisation set in.
            Okoye (2007) affirmed that the quality of and educational programme of a school is determined to a very great extent by the quality of its library.
Research questions
            The following questions were raised to guide the study
  1. 1.     Do non-science teachers teach primary science?
  2. 2.     Are there provisions for staff development in primary schools?
  3. 3.     Are there adequate provisions for conducting science practical in primary schools?
  4. 4.     Do teacher proffer solution to inadequate supply of instructional material where necessary?
  5. 5.     Are there relevant sources of information centre for teaching science in primary school?
Procedure
            The research was a descriptive survey type. The target population was all primary school teachers in kwara state. The sampled population was all teachers teaching science in Edu Local Government Areas primary school, kwara State. A total of 118 science teachers took part in the study.
Questionnaire developed by the researchers containing 7 items and 23 items in section A and B respectively was used to collect data.
            The researcher personally took the questionnaire to the Local Government Board through which it was administered to the teachers and collected back through same. The data collocated were analyzed using frequency count and percentages. The result is presented in the tables below to answer research questions raised.
            Results and discussion
Research question 1: Do non-science teachers teach primary science?
Table 1
Item
% yes
% no
% void
12
26
73
1
From table 1 it was revealed that 26% of science teachers teach science only while majority of the teachers teach all subjects. 37% of the teachers specialise in science and majority of the science teachers specialises in social studies. Table iii indicated that 72.1% of those teachers who specialises in sciences are in integrated science.
Table ii
Specialization
Number
Percentage (%)
Science
43
37
Social studies
46
39
Others
28
34
Table iii
  Science Specialization
Number
Percentage (%)
Biology
7
16.3
Chemistry
5
14.6
Physics
_
_
Integrated science
31
72.1
Others
-
-
Research question 2: Are there provisions for staff development in primary schools?
Table iv
Item
% yes
% no
% void
4
60
39
1
5
38
51
11
From table iv 60% of the teachers had attended seminar, conferences and workshop and only 38% of them had enjoyed in-service training since they have been teaching.
Research question 3: Are there adequate provisions for conducting practical in primary school?
Table v
Item
% yes
% no
% void
8
2
98
_
9
68
32
_
It could be inferred from table v that there are no science laboratories in primary schools, yet they still conduct practical lessons for pupils.
Research question 4: Do teacher uses instructional material for teaching and make provision where not available?
Table VI
Item
% yes
% no
% void
2
60
30
10
15
98
2
_
16
92
8
_
17
88
4
8
18
96
3
1
19
83
12
5
20
88
10
2
22
65
26
9
 Table vi indicated that 60% of the teachers are qualified trained teachers of which 84% of them are NCE holder as observed in table x and 98% of these teachers used teaching aids regularly to teach. The table also indicated that teaching enhance better understanding of science. Where instructional materials are not available 88% of the teachers improved and 65% of these teachers allowed pupil to participate in the process of improvisation.
Research question 5: Are there relevant sources of information centre for teaching science in primary schools?
Table vii
Item
% yes
% no
% void
6
4
93
3
7
31
67
2
The table revealed that only 4% had library and 31% of these library had relevant science textbooks.
Methods of teaching
Table viii
Method
Demonstration
Discovery
Field trip
Discussion
Project
Others
%
38
32
_
14
_
16
Table viii revealed that 38 and 32% of the teachers used demonstration and discovery method of teaching respectively. None of the teachers used project and field trips methods
Sources of science equipment
Table ix
Sources
Government
Community
School management
Others
%
61
2
12
22
Table ix revealed that government is the major source of supply of science equipment.
Teacher's qualification
Table x
Qualification
Grade II
NCE
B.Ed
Others
%
5
84
10
1
Years of teaching experience
Table xi
Years
Less than 3
3-10
Above 10
%
2
56
42
Period of teaching per week
Table xii
Period
Once
Twice
More than twice
%
3
18
78
Tables xi and xii revealed that teachers had been long in teaching and science is prominent in school time table.
Discussion
Specialization is very important in all human endeavours. Science teacher in primary school are not specialized, this is the reason why social studies teachers are teaching science. This is not good enough for the development of science and technology in the nation. The implication is that the teacher will only teach what he/she knows and leave what he/she doesn't know. Pupil in such class will not be sound in science and may not be able to continue in future.
          Staff development is very essential in every sector of our economy, education inclusive. What do we expect from a teacher who has never attended seminar, conference and workshop for many years? Such a teacher will not be able to update his/her knowledge in science. Science is dynamic, new things are discovered every day. Researches are going on every day, the results of which is made public through seminars, conferences and workshop. Many of the teachers are NCE holders, this suppose not to be, when one consider how long they had been in teaching. They should have gone on in-service training for higher qualification. If it continues like this a time is coming when NCE science teacher will not be able to handle primary school science because school curriculum is changing every time.
          Science without laboratory is worse than a mechanic without a workshop. Laboratory is that school building set apart for scientific inquiry. According to Aina (2010) laboratory provides pupils with opportunities to engage in processes of investigation and inquiry. Like the school under study how will they carry out investigation and inquiry when many of them had no laboratory? The implication is that science learnt under such situation will be crude and cannot meet up with the present technological development of the nation. Pupil in such primary school will only be interesting in other disciplines like sociology, history etc. when they get to high school and this will not be better for our nation.
          It is highly encouraging that teachers in these schools used instructional materials regularly. This confirmed its importance in teaching and learning processes as observed by Kola (2007) that instructional materials aid learning.
          Library is very important to teaching and learning in this age of information communication technology (ICT). According to Lawal (2002) library is a dynamic institution providing societal information needs and preserving societal records in the most systematic and scientific manner. Library is very important to any level of education. Primary schools not having library and the available few not having relevant textbooks are not acceptable. The implication is that books are very costly now for pupil to buy; they could only use those in the library where there is library. The question is where there is no library what will the pupil read? There is the need to encourage reading habit of students from the primary school. Where there is no library and no relevant textbooks, reading will be very difficult.
          Methods of teaching used by teachers' are good and encouraging but teaching of science at any level require project and field trip method. Learning of science should be made real by giving project to pupil that will take them out of classroom to explore nature. According to Abdullahi (1982) field trips help to add reality to and verification of scientific laws. The saying that experience is the best teacher might be true but there is the need to allow fresh graduate to teach in primary schools because of the latest development in science teaching which the old teachers might not have the privilege many years ago in their studies.
Conclusion and recommendations
          From the research questions, it was observed that primary school science teachers are not specialized, the implication is that science teaching in this level will be inadequate and this will have adverse effect on the development of science and technology of the nation. Absence of laboratory, library and relevant science textbook in primary school is not good enough for the technological development of the nation. Pupils are not doing science but learning it, because all their activities start and end in classroom without outside classroom science project and fields trips. This will make the pupils to have misconception of abstractness of science, which is not good. Staff development is not adequate this will have far reaching effect on teacher's productivity.
Recommendations
          In view of the above conclusion the following recommendations are suggested.
Specialised science teacher should be teaching science in primary school. Someone who is not a science teacher by certificate should not be allowed to teach science. Laboratory and library must be provided for all primary school with relevant science materials and textbooks. Primary schools teacher must be mandated to go for in-service training to upgrade their certificate regularly. Education is dynamic so teacher must not be static.
Quality education is costly and community and corporate bodies should not leave it finances in the hand of government alone.
          Science teacher must always teach science through project and take pupils out of classroom to places of interest to make science real to the pupils.
References
Abdullahi, a (1982). Science teaching in Nigeria: The author.
Abimbola, a (1999). Principles and practice of educational technology. Ibadan International publisher.
Aina, J.K (2010). The Prospective Physics Teacher. Basic Concepts in Science 2: The author.
Akinola, B.M.A (2006). Causes of Mass Failure in Senior Secondary
School Chemistry in Ijebu East Local Government Area of Ogun State. Oro Science Educational Journal.4(5&6),19.
Daniel, I.Y (2001). Improvisation and use of Instructional Materials in Science
Teaching. A paper presented at NCCCE/UNESCO Workshop for Train the Trainers' Workshop Kotangora Nigeria.
Ilemobade, A.A (1994). Science and Technology Education. In O.O Akinkugbe (Ed). Nigeria and Education: The Challenge Ahead.
Kola, A.J (2007). Uses of Instructional Materials for Teaching and
 Learning Physics in Edu and Patigi Local Government Areas, Nigeria. InternationalJournal of Research in Education. 4(1&2), 74-79
Lawal, B.S (2002). Relevance of Information Technology (IT) in the Management of Libraries in Kwara State. Lafiagi Journal of Science Education 4 (1&2), 168-177.
Maduabum,M.A (1991). Primary School Science Teaching in Nigeria. A need for Re-Appraisal.  Journal of Teacher Education 1 (1), 97-103
Momoh, A.Y (2001). Primary Education Sokoto State. The Teacher Factor.  Journal of Teacher Education. 9 (1) 80-86.
Okoye, M.O (2007). Innovative Strategies for Library Services, Development and Provision in Secondary Schools for Universal Basic Education (UBE) Programme. International Journal of Research in Education 4 (1&2), 286-295.
Uchenna, C (2005). Science Curricula Trends: Implication for Science Education for Future. Nigerian Journal of Professional Teachers 1 (1), 172-180
Yoloye, ea (1994). Primacy Education. In O.O Akinkugbe (Ed). Nigeria and Education. Challenges Ahead.  

The Era of News

The Era of News


This is the era of mass communication and journalism. Wherever we glance through we just find the bulk ofnews around us. Thousands of newspapers as well as online news agencies are launching their own news about the contemporary happenings of the world every day. When it comes to news, it is a liner which is comprised of any important event, activity or happening of the global world. Generally news can be consisted of any types such as social, economic, political, art, cultural, terrorism, suicides, religious, health, technology, science, business, marketing, and disaster news. More importantly, a live coverage is given to the world news frequently.
In essence, there are plenty of renowned world news agencies and sites out there which are uniquely known as Sky news, BBC world news, Canadian news, ABC news, Reuter's news, CNN world news, GEO news,India newsDhaka news, Austrian news, African news, Fox news, Yahoo news, CNN headline news, and many more. The most wonderful aspect about them is that they have been truly merged into the categories of world news. That is why there are plenty of world news categories out there which are undoubtedly known as health news, business news, technology news,science news, sports news, economics news, marketing news and many more.
Today's world is already driven by Technology and News Provider. The way in which news we are providing is totally different, the news we are providing is Bangaldesh news. Today there is lots of competition and you can get latest news from internet easily.Dhaka news provides technology news, digital Bangladesh, business, education, health, international, entertainment, politics and sports news and all the fresh news within some fraction of time.
The best way to learn and gather more information and knowledge about your society, city, state, country or the world, is to read newspapers and if you can attain all the important news items on internet, it becomes further more easy. Digital media through internet has nearly killed the print media; however, it has certainly increased our potential to remain aware about various activities going on around the world. Dhaka news is an internet based newsletter, or say a news magazine that covers many categories of information and news such as financial news, political news, technological news, news related to arts, health and sports news.
The news actually updates about the latest events happening around and in the different parts of the world. Any incident happening at any corner of the world comes in a moment to every one through the different media available now days. With the advent of Internet services people could actually see things happening in front of their eyes at any time of the day. Most of the news channel telecast the news 24 hours seven days. The news telecasted by the Bangladesh news covers a wide range starting from entertainment to catastrophic events and from parliamentary sessions to sports news.

Skulls with mix of traits shine light on human evolution

Skulls with mix of traits shine light on human evolution




Researchers have analyzed the biggest collection of ancient human fossils ever recovered from a single excavation site. Their study in the 20 June issue of the journal Science sheds light on the origin and evolution of Neanderthals, an extinct species of human.

The researchers identified both Neanderthal-like features and features associated with earlier humans in the fossils. This mixed pattern supports a theory of Neanderthal evolution that suggests Neanderthals developed their distinctive jaws and teeth and other features separately, at different times, not all at once as some scientists have thought. In other words, human evolution didn't proceed through a slow process of change with just one kind of human, or hominid, quietly evolving towards the classic Neanderthal.

Having this new data from the Sima de los Huesos site, as the Spanish cave site is called, has allowed scientists to better understand hominid evolution during the Middle Pleistocene, a period in which the path of hominid evolution has been controversial.

About 400 to 500 thousand years ago, in the heart of an era called the Pleistocene in which ice repeatedly cover big stretches of land, ancient humans lived in Africa and East Asia. Some split off, ultimately settling in Eurasia (land including both Europe and Asia). There, they evolved characteristics that would come to define the Neanderthal line.

Several hundred thousand years after that, modern humans—who had evolved in Africa—settled in Eurasia, too. They interbred with Neanderthals, but breeding wasn't always successful because the two groups had changed over time. Because of their differences, modern humans—whose differences helped them be more successful—eventually replaced Neanderthals.

The degree of difference between Neanderthals and modern humans over such a short period surprised scientists. Why did Neanderthals differentiate so quickly from other early hominids? What pattern of changes did Neanderthals undergo?

To answer these questions, scientists have needed an accurate picture of European populations around 400,000 years ago, the early stages of the Neanderthal lineage. This has been challenging to obtain, however, because the European fossil record is incomplete.

Samples at the Sima de los Huesos site, however, are different, representing a unique bunch of hominin fossils from a single species, and including 17 skulls, many of which are very complete. Some have been studied before, but seven are presented anew here, by a team led by Juan-Luis Arsuaga, Professor of Paleontology at Madrid's Complutensis University.

Studying these intact samples, the researchers observed a pattern: There were Neanderthal features in the face and teeth, but not in other parts of the skull. Many of the Neanderthal-like features were related to chewing.

The work of Arsuaga et al. helps address hypotheses about Neanderthal evolution, specifically the accretion model hypothesis, which suggests that Neanderthals evolved their defining features at different times. This study suggests that facial changes were the first step.

Life began when algorithms took control

Life began when algorithms took control


It’s no wonder that scientists haven’t been able to solve the mystery of the origin of life. They don’t know what the solution would look like if they found it.
Any proposal for how life originated faces the inconvenient annoyance that life has evaded all attempts to precisely define it. Consequently it’s pretty hard to say exactly how it started.
“Without a definition for life, the problem of how life began is not well posed,” write physicists/astrobiologistsSara Imari Walker and Paul Davies of Arizona State University.
Presumably, life originated with the arrival of some particularly complicated chemistry. Various nonliving molecules somehow accumulated in a way that initiated metabolism, reproduction and eventually evolution. So searchers for life’s origins have focused on finding out what those molecules were and how they worked. But it’s important, Walker and Davies point out, to narrow that focus to the right aspect of molecular activity.
“A common source of confusion stems from the fact that molecules play three distinct roles: structural, informational and chemical,” the scientists write in a paper published last year in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface.
It’s the informational role that is the key to transforming nonliving chemistry into life, they contend. “The manner in which information flows through and between cells and sub-cellular structures is quite unlike anything else observed in nature. If life is more than just complex chemistry, its unique informational management properties may be the crucial indicator of this distinction.”
Specifically, Walker and Davies argue that life’s origin involved the separation of information processing from information storage. Metabolism is itself a sort of information processing — input information is “processed” via chemical reactions into output products, just as a computer program converts input data into output. But chemical reactions happening on their own do not in themselves constitute life. It’s the origin of the computer program — the stored information controlling what happens — that marks life’s beginnings.
“Living and nonliving matter differ fundamentally in the way information is organized and flows through the system: biological systems are distinctive because information manipulates the matter it is instantiated in,” Walker and Davies assert. Information’s control over the matter containing it — what Walker and Davies call “context-dependent causation” — is therefore life’s defining feature. “The origin of life may thus be identified when information gains top-down causal efficacy over the matter that instantiates it.”
In other words, when the information stored in molecules begins telling the molecules what to do, chemistry becomes life.
Walker and Davies refer to this transformation as an “algorithmic takeover.” Chemical reactions such as those of metabolism process analog information — the information is represented in the actual molecules physically performing the processes. Life’s computer program is stored digitally, in DNA. (Too bad it is not short for digital nucleic acid.) DNA’s information is processed algorithmically, by the reading of codes contained in the arrangement of molecules that are distinct from the molecules that participate in the actual metabolism.
This digitally stored information contains not only the blueprint for making the organism, but also the instructions for constructing the organism from the blueprint. These instructions, the algorithm, control the chemistry. So algorithmic takeover is the hallmark of life’s origin. It marks a sharp transition between life and nonlife, framing the origin of life question more precisely.
“The real challenge of life’s origin is thus to explain how instructional information control systems emerge naturally and spontaneously from mere molecular dynamics,” Walker and Davies write.
Perhaps, they acknowledge, some sort of “analog” life could exist, but it would be at a serious disadvantage once “information control” assumed command in a competing chemical system. A digital algorithmic system would be better able to cope with changing environments thanks to “the physical separation of information and its material representation.”
“Therefore, life forms that ‘go digital’ may be the only systems that survive in the long run and are thus the only remaining product of the processes that led to life,” Walker and Davies speculate.
A key feature of biological information in algorithmic life is feedback from the environment. That means the algorithmic rules can change over time, “in a manner that is both a function of the current state and the history of the organism,” Walker and Davies write. Understanding how the rules change could have implications for evolution. It’s possible, for instance, that evolution’s complexity could be represented by processes described by algorithmic systems known as cellular automata, as Walker, Davies and other collaborators explore in a recent paper (see Part 1).
In any case, viewing life as a computational process addresses some old controversies about life in new ways. In particular, it demolishes the old argument that life is too complex to have originated without a designer. Whereas in fact, algorithmic systems such as cellular automata show that systems of vast complexity can emerge from simple rules operating on initially simple systems, as Stephen Wolfram emphasized in his book A New Kind of Science in 2002.
So with algorithms and digital information, complexity is the natural expectation. You need a designer only if you want to keep things simple.

Animal sex lives exposed in 'Nature's Nether Regions'

Animal sex lives exposed in 'Nature's Nether Regions'



f you want to enjoy eating lightly cooked calamari, skip down two paragraphs. And avoid page 20 of evolutionary biologist Schilthuizen’s charming and potentially mind-boggling new book on what he calls the “science of the genitals.”
An underappreciated quirk of squid genitals, he explains, provides a bit of truth behind the 2012 tabloid headline “Woman, 63, becomes pregnant in the mouth with baby squid after eating calamari.” Male squid encase gobs of sperm in membranes, sometimes covered with spikes, creating “spring-loaded sperm grenades,” as Schilthuizen puts it. Even after the squid dies, insufficiently cooked grenades can on occasion burst apart into cephalopod sperm shrapnel inside a diner’s mouth.
The book offers more fascinating tidbits on squid mating (males have a penis but don’t deliver sperm with it) and plenty of other lively biology. What distinguishes this parade of marvels from other “wow, is nature weird” volumes is that Schilthuizen uses the creatures to offer an appealing introduction to the big themes in current research on
how sexual parts, practices and ornaments have become so elaborate and diverse across the domains of life.
Genital evolution goes far beyond the merely postal challenges of delivering and receiving sperm at the right address. Schilthuizen reviews the idea, for instance, that partner persuasion continues even after wooing. This may explain built-in sensory enhancers; male crane flies in action scrape their genitals into humming with a pitch slightly below middle C. And then there are the conflicts of interest between the sexes, which as Schilthuizen explains in a counterintuitive twist may be especially important among hermaphrodites with identical sets of parts.
In spite of the skillfully explained evolutionary concepts, what may be most memorable to readers is the vast oddness of other species’ genitals. Hermaphroditic Deroceras slugs have female openings, for instance, but partners transfer sperm from penis to penis. Certain female mites lay eggs through a conventional opening located to the
rear but take in sperm through their hips. And Schilthuizen compares a chicken flea’s elaborate sperm-delivery contraption, complete with combs, plates and springs, with “an exploded grandfather clock.” Yet, he shows, the same kinds of evolutionary forces shape humankind’s intimate shapes too. 

When Tesla died his entire estate and all his property was seized by the Alien Property Custodian under the orders of the FBI - even though he was a US citizen!

When Tesla died his entire estate and all his property was seized by the Alien Property Custodian under the orders of the FBI - even though he was a US citizen!


Nikola Tesla was a Serbian American best known for his contribution to the design of the Alternating Current (AC) electricity supply system.
He was an inventor, electrical engineer, mechanical engineer, and futurist. He was very well known as a showman and it earned him the reputation of ‘mad scientist.’
Tesla once proclaimed that he received signals on his receiver while doing experiments in Colorado. He believed it could have come from Mars because they were substantially different from signals that he had previously observed from the noise of storms and the earth.
He was highly criticized when he revealed these ‘findings’.
When Tesla died on 7 January 1943 the FBI ordered the Alien Property Custodian to seize all his belongings even though he was a U.S. citizen. His entire estate was taken to a warehouse under the Office of Alien Property seal.
John G. Trump, a technical aide to the National Defense Research Committee was asked to analyse everything belonging to Tesla in the custody of the Office of Alien Property. After three days of thoroughly investigating everything he released a report that concluded that there was nothing that would be dangerous in unfriendly hands.
In 1952 Tesla's entire estate was shipped to Belgrade in 80 trunks marked N.T.

Read more at http://www.omgfacts.com/category/7/Science?&redirectfrom=www.omg-facts.com#2A5PO6PDu9gspf0q.99

Sunday, 29 June 2014

NASA Launching Satellite to Track Carbon

Photo
An illustration of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, ready to launch Tuesday to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide. CreditJPL/NASA
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
Continue reading the main story
On an average day, some 100 million tons of carbon dioxide is liberated from oil and coal by combustion, wafting into the air. The gas traps heat in the atmosphere, resulting inthe gradual warming that has alarmed scientists and much of the public.
But only half of the carbon dioxide stays up there; the other half falls back to earth. While scientists know what happens to half of that half — it dissolves into the oceans — the rest is a continuing puzzle. It is taken up by growing plants, but nobody knows exactly where and how. “Somewhere on earth, on land, one-quarter of all our carbon emissions released through fossil fuel emissions is disappearing,” said David Crisp, a senior research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “We can’t identify the processes responsible for this. Wouldn’t it be nice to know where?”
Now NASA is launching a satellite to help solve the puzzle.
The satellite, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, is scheduled to lift off Tuesday morning from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Passing over the North and South Poles at an altitude of 438 miles, it will observe the same spots every 16 days as the earth rotates beneath.
These repeated measurements will allow scientists to observe the rise and fall of carbon dioxide with the seasons. They may also figure out how the balance changes with droughts or floods.
That should give them a better idea of whether the oceans and land plants will continue to absorb half of the carbon dioxide emissions as in the past or whether any of these so-called carbon sinks are close to overflowing, leaving even more gas in the air.
In particular, scientists do not understand how plants have kept pace with fossil fuel emissions that have nearly tripled since 1960. “Have you seen a new rain forest spring out of nowhere that wasn’t there before?” asked Dr. Crisp, the leader of the science team for the mission. “No.”
The orbiting observatory carries a single instrument, to measure colors of sunlight bouncing off the earth. The relative intensity of the colors will tell how much carbon dioxide the light beam passed through, and the spacecraft will take a million measurements a day.
Because of intervening clouds, only a tenth of the measurements — about 100,000 a day — will prove useful data. Still, that will dwarf what 150 carbon dioxide measuring stations on the ground are able to provide. A Japanese satellite is making similar measurements, but with less precision.
An earlier Orbiting Carbon Observatory mission failed in 2009, when the clamshell nose cone surrounding the spacecraft did not open and the satellite splashed into the ocean a few minutes after liftoff — a $273 million loss. “That was a heartbreak, utter devastation,” said Ralph R. Basilio, the project manager for the current mission.
At the end of 2009, the Obama administration decided to build a nearly identical satellite scheduled for launch in February 2013. But those plans were disrupted when the same launch failure that had doomed the first mission occurred again, destroying another NASA satellite, the Glory mission, in 2011.
The space agency then decided to switch rockets, putting the new satellite on a Delta 2 rocket, which has long history of successful launches.
The switch delayed the launching date, and the bigger Delta 2 added to the cost — which totaled $467.5 million this time. The cost also includes an extra copy of the carbon dioxide measuring instrument, which was built to ensure against delays if problems arose during testing. That extra instrument may be flown to the International Space Station to provide another set of observations.
Levels of carbon dioxide in the air have jumped 40 percent since the start of the Industrial Revolution, but the amount is still tiny: Of every million molecules of air, just 400 are carbon dioxide. Over a power plant or a city where emissions are higher, that number rises by perhaps one molecule per million. A field of corn stalks at the height of growing season might reduce the number by a similar amount.
To detect such minute changes, Dr. Crisp said, the parts of the 300-pound instrument had to be aligned within the width of a human hair. The scientists think they may also be able to discern a faint infrared fluorescent glow emitted by plants as they photosynthesize, which could indicate their health.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 is part of a busy year for NASA’s earth sciences division — the second of five launches — reflecting increased financing for this segment of NASA even as other parts have been squeezed by tight budgets.
Michael Freilich, director of the earth sciences division, said, “There is no question that the Obama administration puts a very high priority on understanding the earth.”